tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36765980.post2264143686140377244..comments2009-06-20T14:53:06.687-07:00Comments on The Poker: eutolmoshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00401091985280609052noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36765980.post-28198945061348533882009-02-27T12:36:00.000-08:002009-02-27T12:36:00.000-08:00You're right, Anon. My fondness for veiled wordpla...You're right, Anon. My fondness for veiled wordplay and private jokes doesn't necessarily translate the way I think it does. Your point is well taken. <BR/><BR/>To clarify, my usage of 'tender' is its archaic sense, and the "one clue at time" reference is a nod to one my viewers (back when). <BR/><BR/>Hope this helps.eutolmoshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00401091985280609052noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36765980.post-8164748636696876772008-04-27T22:32:00.000-07:002008-04-27T22:32:00.000-07:00Interesting effort. However, a curious and opaque...Interesting effort. However, a curious and opaque subtitle, despite your explanation. "Tendering...embers" is a strange turn of phrase--did you perhaps mean "Tending...embers"? But even the latter doesn't imply agitation or "stirring". Also, the analogy fails if one attempts to envision a flame of discourse or thought coalescing one ember at a time--not an overly stimulating prospect. Incidentally, what sort of clues do you plan to post?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com